Section 143 (TAA) – Purpose of Part

143.    Purpose of Part

 

(1)     A basic principle in tax law is that it is the duty of SARS to assess and collect tax according to the laws enacted by Parliament and not to forgo a tax which is properly chargeable and payable.

 

(2)     Circumstances may require that the strictness and rigidity of this basic principle be tempered, if such flexibility is to the best advantage of the State.

 

(3)     The purpose of this Part is to prescribe the circumstances in which it is appropriate for SARS to temper the basic principle and ‘settle’ a ‘dispute’.

Section 157 (TAA) – Personal liability of withholding agent

157.    Personal liability of withholding agent

 

(1)     A withholding agent is personally liable for an amount of tax-

 

(a)     withheld and not paid to SARS; or

 

(b)     which should have been withheld under a tax Act but was not so withheld.

 

(2)     An amount paid or recovered from a withholding agent in terms of subsection (1) is an amount of tax which is paid on behalf of the relevant taxpayer in respect of his or her liability under the relevant tax Act.

Section 132 (TAA) – Publication of judgment of tax court

132.    Publication of judgment of tax court

 

A judgment of the tax court dealing with an appeal under this Chapter must be published for general information and, unless the sitting of the tax court was public under the circumstances referred to in section 124(2), in a form that does not reveal the ‘appellant’s’ identity.

Section 145 (TAA) – Circumstances where settlement is inappropriate

145.    Circumstances where settlement is inappropriate

 

It is inappropriate and not to the best advantage of the State to ‘settle’ a ‘dispute’ if in the opinion of SARS-

 

(a)     no circumstances envisaged in section 146 exist and-

 

(i)      the action by the person concerned that relates to the ‘dispute’ constitutes intentional tax evasion or fraud;

 

(ii)     the ‘settlement’ would be contrary to the law or a practice generally prevailing and no exceptional circumstances exist to justify a departure from the law or practice; or

 

(iii)    the person concerned has not complied with the provisions of a tax Act and the non-compliance is of a serious nature;

 

(b)     it is in the public interest to have judicial clarification of the issue and the case is appropriate for this purpose; or

 

(c)     the pursuit of the matter through the courts will significantly promote taxpayer compliance with a tax Act and the case is suitable for this purpose.